- New sovereign fund targets oil, gold, and critical minerals
- Governance and financing gaps raise IMF scrutiny
ABIDJAN, CÔTE D’IVOIRE – Ivory Coast has launched a sovereign wealth fund to capture its fast-growing extractive revenues, but unanswered questions over governance and financing threaten to define its credibility.
The Council of Ministers on April 15 adopted an ordinance establishing the Fonds souverain stratégique pour le développement de la Côte d’Ivoire (FSDI), a vehicle designed to capture, manage, and grow revenues from oil, gold, and critical mineral discoveries that have transformed the country’s economic outlook.
This article is free to read.
Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.
Unlike our competitors, we don't force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.
Create your free account or sign in
The move marks a strategic pivot for an economy that, a decade ago, had neither the scale nor the resource base to justify such a fund. In 2015, Côte d’Ivoire produced fewer than 30,000 barrels of oil per day and extracted about 30 tonnes of gold annually. It had no coltan or lithium in its mining portfolio.
Today, the picture is fundamentally different.
Oil production reached 44,139 barrels per day in 2024, a 50% increase year on year, with projections pointing to more than 194,721 barrels per day by 2029. The IMF, in its fifth programme review published in February 2026, expects economic growth to peak at 7% in 2029, largely driven by hydrocarbons, before stabilising near 6%.
At the core of the FSDI’s rationale is a simple but powerful premise: the Ivorian state already holds significant stakes across the extractive sector but lacks a consolidated mechanism to maximise long-term value.
Through Petroci Holding, the state holds a 10% stake in every producing or developing oil block, including Baleine, Calao and CI-501. In mining, the state similarly maintains a 10% equity stake in all licensed operations, managed through Sodemi. Yet this portfolio — spanning hydrocarbons, gold, manganese and now critical minerals — has never been publicly valued.
The FSDI is designed, in part, to change that.
From resource boom to strategic capital
The scale of Côte d’Ivoire’s extractive expansion underscores the urgency of institutionalising its gains.
Gold production climbed to 59.1 tonnes in 2024 from 51.1 tonnes the previous year, with a government target of 100 tonnes annually by 2030. The country also attracted $186 million in mining exploration investment in 2025, the highest in Africa, according to S&P Global.
Fiscal revenues from mining reached €501 million in 2023, generated by 13 industrial gold mines operated by companies including Barrick Gold, Endeavour Mining and Perseus Mining. Yet even larger projects remain in the pipeline.
Montage Gold’s Koné project, estimated at 155 tonnes of gold, represents a $610 million investment, while Resolute Mining’s Doropo discovery is described as world-class.
Meanwhile, manganese output has surged from 207,000 tonnes in 2016 to over 1 million tonnes in 2024.
The next frontier lies in critical minerals tied to the global energy transition. In May 2024, Côte d’Ivoire created Ivoire Coltan to exploit a deposit in Sipilou estimated at 160 million tonnes over a 20-year lifespan. In 2025, Atlantic Lithium confirmed a spodumene-bearing pegmatite discovery between Rubino and Agboville, with grades of 1.25%.
These developments place Côte d’Ivoire squarely within the geopolitics of battery supply chains, where demand for lithium and coltan is accelerating alongside electric vehicle production.
Against this backdrop, the FSDI is structured around three pillars: an infrastructure development fund to finance strategic projects, an economic stabilisation fund to cushion external shocks, and a long-term savings fund to build national wealth.
It is integrated into a broader public finance ecosystem alongside the Caisse des dépôts et consignations, an SME guarantee fund and reformed pension schemes — suggesting a deliberate attempt to centralise and professionalise state asset management.
Yet the ambition of the architecture contrasts sharply with the modesty of its starting capital.
The fund’s minimum initial capitalisation is set at 15 billion CFA francs — roughly $23 million — highlighting a significant gap between vision and financial firepower. Across Africa, only a handful of sovereign wealth funds exceed $1.5 billion, including Egypt ($12.7 billion), Angola ($2.5 billion) and Nigeria ($1.79 billion).
Governance test under IMF watch
If scale is one challenge, governance is another — and arguably more decisive.
The FSDI will draw financing from a share of extractive revenues and the transfer of public assets. But three critical questions remain unanswered: the precise share of revenues to be allocated, the list and valuation of assets to be transferred, and the composition of its governing bodies.
These uncertainties matter in a country where fiscal space remains constrained.
Public debt stood at 59.5% of GDP in 2024 and is projected to decline to 55% by 2026, according to the IMF. The fiscal deficit has been reduced to 3% of GDP, meeting the WAEMU convergence ceiling. However, tax revenues remain at 15% of GDP, well below the government’s medium-term target of 20%.
This fiscal backdrop raises a politically sensitive trade-off: whether to channel extractive revenues into long-term savings or deploy them immediately to meet budgetary needs.
The presence of an active $3.5 billion IMF programme adds a layer of external oversight. The Fund, which completed its fifth review in December 2025 and disbursed $839.7 million, has emphasised the need for transparency, improved public asset coverage and disciplined debt management.
The creation of the FSDI by ordinance, followed by a parliamentary ratification process, places the fund within this surveillance framework — potentially strengthening accountability compared with earlier African sovereign fund experiments.
Africa’s track record with such funds is mixed.
Nigeria and Angola launched sovereign wealth funds in 2012 with similar ambitions but have faced persistent questions over transparency and governance. In Nigeria’s case, billions of dollars reportedly disappeared under circumstances that remain unclear. Most African funds rank poorly on transparency indices maintained by the International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds.
The benchmark remains Botswana’s Pula Fund, established in 1994, whose success is attributed less to its legal structure than to the sustained independence of its management from political interference.
In Côte d’Ivoire, the political dimension is already emerging.
Ahoua Don Melo, an opposition figure who campaigned on economic sovereignty during the October 2025 presidential election, welcomed the fund’s creation but warned of the risks. He cautioned that the FSDI could become a political slush fund if leadership appointments follow partisan lines rather than merit.
That warning goes to the heart of the fund’s future.
The April 15 decision answers a fundamental question: how should Côte d’Ivoire manage its emerging resource wealth? But it leaves open the more difficult one: whether the country can build an institution capable of insulating that wealth from political cycles and short-term pressures.
The coming months will provide the first signals.
The pace and content of parliamentary ratification, the clarity of revenue allocation rules, the transparency of asset transfers and the independence of governance structures will determine whether the FSDI evolves into a credible sovereign wealth institution — or remains a vehicle of ambition without substance.
